| 1 | Inserting “Jehovah” into the New Testament 237 times | Appendix A; all 27 Christian Greek Scripture books except several shorter letters | The NWT prints “Jehovah” 237 times in the New Testament main text. | The extant Greek manuscript tradition reads κύριος (“Lord”), θεός (“God”), or—in James 1:12—contains no explicit divine noun at the point where “Jehovah” is supplied. | The issue is not the use of a divine-name form for יהוה in the Hebrew Bible. The issue is reconstructing a Hebrew name into a Greek text without surviving Greek manuscript support. This policy can also decide whether “Lord” refers to the Father, Christ, or an intentionally interconnected context before the reader has examined the passage. | This is the broadest and most objectively documentable departure from the extant Greek text. The complete index is supplied in Appendix A. | The NWT’s official Appendix A5 still gives the total as 237. The older Reference Bible appendix supplies the verse-by-verse list and identifies 223 underlying κύριος occurrences, 13 θεός occurrences, and one supplied noun at James 1:12. | Grade Asystematic substitution |
| 2 | Adding “other” four times to Colossians 1:16–17 | Colossians 1:16–17 | “By means of him all other things were created … All other things have been created through him … he is before all other things … by means of him all other things were made to exist.” | Greek repeatedly has τὰ πάντα, “all things,” without ἄλλα, “other.” | The addition narrows “all things” so that Christ may be placed inside the class of created things and then treated as creator of everything else. The NWT study note openly argues for the supplied word on contextual and theological grounds, but that is interpretation, not translation of a lexical item present in the verse. | One of the clearest doctrinal additions in the translation. | Older editions placed “other” in brackets, visibly signaling an addition. The 2013 revision removed the brackets while retaining the word. | Grade Aadded word with doctrinal effect |
| 3 | Supplying “Jehovah” where James 1:12 has no divine noun | James 1:12 | “…the crown of life, which Jehovah promised to those who continue loving Him.” | The Greek relative clause is ὃν ἐπηγγείλατο τοῖς ἀγαπῶσιν αὐτόν, literally, “which he promised to those loving him.” | Unlike most NWT New Testament uses of “Jehovah,” this instance does not replace κύριος or θεός. It explicitly names the antecedent of a pronoun that Greek leaves implicit. | A direct interpretive insertion into the main text. | — | Grade Asupplied subject |
| 4 | Adding “Son” to Acts 20:28 | Acts 20:28 | “…the congregation of God, which he purchased with the blood of his own Son.” | Greek: τὴν ἐκκλησίαν τοῦ θεοῦ … διὰ τοῦ αἵματος τοῦ ἰδίου. Restrained: “the church of God, which he obtained through the blood of his own,” or traditionally, “with his own blood.” | The word “Son” is not written. The expression τοῦ ἰδίου can function substantivally (“his Own [One]”), so the NWT’s interpretation is possible; however, printing “Son” in the main text removes a difficult ambiguity and prevents the wording “God … his own blood.” | The interpretation belongs in a footnote, not as an unmarked noun in the text. | — | Grade A/Bexplicit noun added to resolve ambiguity |
| 5 | Changing the first-person object in Zechariah 12:10 | Zechariah 12:10 | “…they will look to the one whom they pierced, and they will wail over him…” | Masoretic Hebrew: וְהִבִּיטוּ אֵלַי אֵת אֲשֶׁר־דָּקָרוּ, “they will look to me, whom they pierced.” | The NWT changes the first-person “to me” into the third-person “to the one,” distancing the pierced figure from the speaker. The following pronoun “over him” is present in Hebrew and creates a real grammatical difficulty, but the solution should not silently replace אֵלַי (“to me”) with a third-person expression. | A highly consequential harmonizing alteration; the literal pronoun should remain in the text with alternatives noted. | — | Grade A/Bpronoun-level alteration |
| 6 | Replacing “is” with “means” in the institution narratives | Matthew 26:26, 28; Mark 14:22, 24; Luke 22:19–20; 1 Corinthians 11:24–25 | Examples: “This means my body”; “This means my blood”; “This cup means the new covenant…” | Greek uses ἐστίν (“is”), or an elliptical nominal construction naturally supplied with “is”: “This is my body”; “This is my blood”; “This cup is the new covenant…” | The copula can certainly be metaphorical in ordinary language. The translation problem is that the NWT places one Eucharistic interpretation—representation—directly into the wording rather than translating “is” and allowing readers to assess its force. | Systematic doctrinal paraphrase in the main text. All eight locations are listed in Appendix B. | — | Grade A/Binterpretive replacement across eight statements |
| 7 | Rendering רוּחַ אֱלֹהִים as “God’s active force” | Genesis 1:2 | “God’s active force was moving about over the surface of the waters.” | Hebrew: רוּחַ אֱלֹהִים, ordinarily “the Spirit of God,” with “a wind from God” as a debated alternative. | רוּחַ means spirit, breath, or wind. “Active force” is not a lexical equivalent; it converts an interpretive conclusion about the Holy Spirit into the wording of the verse. | An explanatory paraphrase presented as translation. | — | Grade A/Bdoctrinal paraphrase |
| 8 | Omitting “me” in John 14:14 | John 14:14 | “If you ask anything in my name, I will do it.” | The leading critical text reads ἐάν τι αἰτήσητέ με ἐν τῷ ὀνόματί μου, “If you ask me anything in my name…” | Some Greek manuscripts omit με (“me”), so this is not a fabricated deletion. Nevertheless, the better-supported reading includes it, and the omission avoids an explicit statement about asking Jesus. | A doctrinally convenient choice among textual variants, not an uncontested corruption. | — | Grade Bpreferred critical reading omitted |
| 9 | Replacing “Christ” with “Jehovah” in 1 Corinthians 10:9 | 1 Corinthians 10:9 | “Neither let us put Jehovah to the test…” | Strong manuscript evidence reads Χριστόν, “Christ”; other witnesses read κύριον, “the Lord,” or θεόν, “God.” No surviving Greek witness reads the Tetragrammaton. | The NWT does not merely select one extant Greek variant. It substitutes a reconstructed Hebrew-form name and removes the striking reading that Israel tested Christ in the wilderness. | The text-critical uncertainty should be preserved; “Jehovah” is not a manuscript reading. | — | Grade A/Breconstructed name over a major variant |
| 10 | Replacing “Jesus” with “Jehovah” in Jude 5 | Jude 5 | “Jehovah, having saved a people out of the land of Egypt…” | Many current critical editions prefer Ἰησοῦς, “Jesus”; other manuscripts have κύριος, “Lord,” or θεός, “God.” | The NWT’s “Jehovah” is found in no surviving Greek manuscript and removes a remarkable reading identifying Jesus as Israel’s deliverer and judge. | A highly consequential, non-manuscript resolution of a genuine variant. | — | Grade A/Breconstructed name over a major variant |
| 11 | Replacing “Lord” with “Jehovah” in Romans 10:13 | Romans 10:9–13 | “Everyone who calls on the name of Jehovah will be saved.” | Greek: πᾶς γὰρ ὃς ἂν ἐπικαλέσηται τὸ ὄνομα κυρίου σωθήσεται, “everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.” | Paul quotes Joel, where the Hebrew has יהוה, but his immediate argument repeatedly names Jesus as “Lord,” speaks of confessing him, and says the same Lord is Lord of all. Printing “Jehovah” prevents readers from seeing the possible application of Joel’s Lord-text to Jesus. | The quotation background belongs in a note; the Greek word “Lord” should remain visible. | — | Grade A/Bsubstitution that controls the contextual referent |
| 12 | Inserting “Jehovah” throughout 2 Corinthians 3:16–18 | 2 Corinthians 3:16–18 | The NWT repeatedly prints “Jehovah” in the sequence about turning to the Lord, the Lord being the Spirit, the Spirit of the Lord, and transformation into the Lord’s image. | Greek repeatedly has κύριος, “Lord.” | Paul’s wording creates a dense relationship among the Lord, Christ, and the Spirit. Replacing the repeated term with “Jehovah” breaks the verbal linkage and decides an exegetical question in the English text. | A recurring example of why the 237-name policy is not neutral. | — | Grade A/Brepeated interpretive substitution |
| 13 | “The Word was a god” | John 1:1 | “…and the Word was a god.” | Greek: καὶ θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος. Restrained: “and the Word was God,” or a qualitative explanation such as “the Word was divine.” | The anarthrous predicate θεός precedes the verb and is naturally qualitative: the Word has the nature of God while remaining personally distinct from “the God” of the preceding clause. English “a god” strongly suggests membership in a class of lesser gods and is not required by the absence of the article. | A doctrinally loaded English rendering of a qualitative construction, though “divine” is a grammatically discussable paraphrase. | — | Grade Bpossible qualitative insight expressed as an indefinite deity |
| 14 | “The only-begotten god” | John 1:18 | “…the only-begotten god who is at the Father’s side…” | A leading critical reading is μονογενὴς θεός, often rendered “the only God,” “the unique God,” or “the only-begotten God”; other manuscripts read “only-begotten Son.” | The NWT is not wrong to follow the θεός reading. The problem is presenting “god” in lowercase and coordinating it with John 1:1 in a way that suggests a second, lesser deity. The verse is a textual-variant and lexical question, not simple proof of corruption. | Doctrinally suggestive, but not a Grade A error because the Greek reading θεός is strongly attested. | — | Grade B/Cstrong textual reading, sectarian capitalization and interpretation |
| 15 | “Before Abraham came into existence, I have been” | John 8:58 | “Before Abraham came into existence, I have been.” | Greek: πρὶν Ἀβραὰμ γενέσθαι ἐγώ εἰμι, literally, “Before Abraham came to be, I am.” | A present-for-past construction can express continuing existence, but the NWT’s perfect-tense English conceals the deliberate contrast between Abraham’s coming-to-be and Jesus’ emphatic ἐγώ εἰμι. The reaction in the following verse also makes the marked wording exegetically important. | A possible grammatical explanation converted into a less transparent main-text rendering. | — | Grade Bobscures the marked present tense |
| 16 | “Gave no consideration to a seizure” | Philippians 2:6 | “…gave no consideration to a seizure, namely, that he should be equal to God.” | Greek: οὐχ ἁρπαγμὸν ἡγήσατο τὸ εἶναι ἴσα θεῷ. Common: “did not regard equality with God as something to exploit/use for his own advantage.” | The debated noun ἁρπαγμός may concern grasping, retaining, or exploiting. The NWT expands it into an explanation suggesting equality with God was an object Christ never possessed and refused to seize. That reading is possible only after a substantial theological decision. | A tendentious paraphrase where a restrained translation and explanatory note are preferable. | — | Grade Bexpansive Christological paraphrase |
| 17 | “Divine quality” instead of “deity” | Colossians 2:9 | “It is in him that all the fullness of the divine quality dwells bodily.” | Greek: πᾶν τὸ πλήρωμα τῆς θεότητος, “all the fullness of deity/the Godhead.” | θεότης denotes deity or the state of being God. It is stronger than θειότης, the term in Romans 1:20 often translated “divine nature/quality.” Rendering θεότης as a singular “divine quality” can sound as though Christ merely possesses a divine attribute. | A materially weaker rendering than the lexical force of θεότης warrants. | — | Grade Blexical weakening |
| 18 | Separating “our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ” | Titus 2:13 | “…the great God and of our Savior, Jesus Christ…” | Greek: τοῦ μεγάλου θεοῦ καὶ σωτῆρος ἡμῶν Χριστοῦ Ἰησοῦ, naturally, “our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ.” | One article governs two singular personal nouns joined by καί and followed by the identifying name. Under the ordinary Granville Sharp construction, both titles describe Jesus Christ. The inserted English “of” encourages two referents. | A grammatically possible minority interpretation made to sound syntactically natural in English at the expense of the Greek construction. | — | Grade Barticle construction split |
| 19 | Separating “our God and Savior Jesus Christ” | 2 Peter 1:1 | “…through the righteousness of our God and the Savior Jesus Christ.” | Greek: τοῦ θεοῦ ἡμῶν καὶ σωτῆρος Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ, naturally, “our God and Savior Jesus Christ.” | As in Titus 2:13, a single article governs the coordinated singular titles and the personal name identifies the referent. The NWT’s extra “the” separates the titles. | A strongly tendentious handling of a normal single-person construction. | — | Grade Barticle construction split |
| 20 | Punctuating Romans 9:5 as a separate doxology | Romans 9:5 | “From them the Christ descended according to the flesh. God, who is over all, be praised forever.” | A straightforward punctuation: “…from them, according to the flesh, is the Christ, who is God over all, blessed forever.” | The earliest manuscripts do not supply modern punctuation. Both analyses have defenders, but the doxology created by the NWT is abrupt, while the relative description of Christ follows the syntax naturally. The translation should acknowledge the ambiguity. | Not a fabricated word, but a doctrinally consequential minority punctuation. | — | Grade B/Cpunctuation choice with major theological effect |
| 21 | “God is your throne” | Hebrews 1:8 | “But about the Son, he says: ‘God is your throne forever and ever.’” | Greek: ὁ θρόνος σου ὁ θεός, naturally vocative, “Your throne, O God, is forever and ever.” | The surrounding address is to the Son, and the next clause continues “the scepter of your kingdom.” Making God the Son’s metaphorical throne is possible but highly unusual and avoids addressing the Son as God. | A strongly doctrinally motivated alternative, not the most natural contextual reading. | — | Grade Bgrammatically possible but contextually strained |
| 22 | “God is your throne” in the source Psalm | Psalm 45:6 | “God is your throne forever and ever.” | Hebrew: כִּסְאֲךָ אֱלֹהִים עוֹלָם וָעֶד, naturally, “Your throne, O God, is forever and ever.” | The NWT adopts the same metaphorical construal later used at Hebrews 1:8. The vocative reading is straightforward and is how Hebrews applies the Psalm to the Son. | A possible but strained rendering selected consistently to avoid the royal figure being addressed as God. | — | Grade Bsame avoidance in Hebrew Bible |
| 23 | “The beginning of the creation by God” | Revelation 3:14 | “…the beginning of the creation by God.” | Greek: ἡ ἀρχὴ τῆς κτίσεως τοῦ θεοῦ, literally, “the beginning/origin/ruler of the creation of God.” | The genitive τοῦ θεοῦ is “of God,” not an explicit “by God.” ἀρχή can mean beginning, origin, source, or ruler. The NWT’s “by God” pushes the phrase toward “the first thing God created,” while “source/origin of God’s creation” is also grammatically viable and fits Johannine creation language. | An interpretive expansion that should not be presented as the only grammatical reading. | — | Grade B/Cgenitive converted into agency |
| 24 | “Origin … from the days of long ago” | Micah 5:2 | “…whose origin is from ancient times, from the days of long ago.” | Hebrew: וּמוֹצָאֹתָיו מִקֶּדֶם מִימֵי עוֹלָם, “whose goings forth are from of old, from ancient/everlasting days.” | “Origin” can imply that the Messiah began to exist at a remote point. The Hebrew can instead refer to ancient or eternal goings-forth. The NWT wording is possible but should not be used as though the Hebrew unambiguously teaches a created Messiah. | A debatable lexical choice, not a clear insertion. | — | Grade Clexically possible but doctrinally suggestive |
| 25 | “Jehovah produced me” in personified Wisdom | Proverbs 8:22 | “Jehovah produced me as the beginning of his way.” | Hebrew קָנָנִי can mean “possessed/acquired me” and in some contexts “created me”; the Septuagint has ἔκτισέν με, “created me.” | The rendering is linguistically possible. The larger problem arises when poetic personified Wisdom is treated as a literal biography of a prehuman created Jesus. Nicene interpreters historically distinguished the poem’s personification and economy from the Son’s eternal divine nature. | Not a demonstrable translation error by itself; the doctrinal inference exceeds what the lexical choice proves. | — | Grade Cpossible verb sense used dogmatically |
| 26 | “Peace among men of goodwill” | Luke 2:14 | “…and on earth peace among men of goodwill.” | The best-attested Greek reads ἐν ἀνθρώποις εὐδοκίας, naturally, “among people of [God’s] favor” or “among those whom he favors.” | The genitive εὐδοκίας describes favor or good pleasure, most naturally God’s favor, not a class of humans possessing goodwill. The NWT can sound as though peace is granted to morally well-disposed people. | A less likely construal of the genitive that changes the direction of the favor. | — | Grade B/Csubjective quality substituted for divine favor |
| 27 | “Conscious of their spiritual need” | Matthew 5:3 | “Happy are those conscious of their spiritual need…” | Greek: μακάριοι οἱ πτωχοὶ τῷ πνεύματι, “Blessed are the poor in spirit.” | The NWT interprets “poor in spirit” as conscious awareness of spiritual need. That may be a useful explanation, but πτωχοί means poor or destitute, and the translation removes the metaphor rather than translating it. | A commentary-level explanation placed in the main text, not a direct lexical rendering. | — | Grade Cexplanatory paraphrase |
| 28 | “Do obeisance” where the same verb is rendered “worship” for God | Matthew 2:2, 8, 11; 8:2; 9:18; 14:33; 15:25; 20:20; 28:9, 17; Mark 5:6; Luke 24:52; John 9:38; Hebrews 1:6 | The NWT commonly uses “obeisance” when προσκυνέω is directed to Jesus, but “worship” when it is directed to God. | προσκυνέω can mean bow down, pay homage, or worship; context must decide. | No single occurrence proves mistranslation because homage can be appropriate. The problem is the consistent direction of the English choice: readers are prevented from seeing that the same Greek verb used for worship of God is repeatedly applied to Christ. Hebrews 1:6 is especially consequential because all God’s angels are commanded to perform the act toward the Son. | A systematic doctrinal translation policy rather than an error in every individual occurrence. | — | Grade B/Csystematic asymmetry |
| 29 | Obscuring the application of Psalm 102 to the Son | Hebrews 1:10–12 | The NWT retains much of the quotation but interprets it within a theology that resists the Son being the creator addressed as “Lord.” | Hebrews moves from “about the Son” in verse 8 through “and” in verse 10, applying to him language from Psalm 102 about the Lord laying earth’s foundations and the heavens being his works. | This is not mainly a mistranslated phrase. It is a contextual inconsistency: the NWT’s Christology must explain why a Hebrew Lord-text about the unchanging creator is applied directly to the Son. | Important exegetically, but it should not be mislabeled as a direct English corruption. | — | Grade Ccontextual problem more than wording error |
| 30 | Moving “today” in Luke 23:43 | Luke 23:43 | “Truly I tell you today, you will be with me in Paradise.” | Conventional punctuation: “Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in Paradise.” | Ancient manuscripts did not contain the modern comma, so punctuation is interpretive. Yet Jesus’ formula “Truly I tell you” is already complete and frequent; adding “today” to the act of speaking is redundant, whereas attaching it to the promise gives the adverb clear force. | The NWT punctuation is theoretically possible but contextually less natural and aligned with denial of conscious postmortem existence that day. | — | Grade Bpunctuation chosen to determine afterlife chronology |
| 31 | “Everlasting cutting-off” | Matthew 25:46 | “These will depart into everlasting cutting-off, but the righteous ones into everlasting life.” | Greek: κόλασιν αἰώνιον, normally “eternal punishment.” | κόλασις means punishment, penalty, or chastisement in context. “Cutting-off” leans on a proposed etymological history rather than the ordinary Koine meaning and supports annihilationist interpretation. | A tendentious rendering that should read “punishment,” with theological alternatives argued separately. | — | Grade Betymological overtranslation |
| 32 | “Keep doing this” in the memorial command | Luke 22:19; 1 Corinthians 11:24–25 | “Keep doing this in remembrance of me.” | Greek present imperative: τοῦτο ποιεῖτε, simply and naturally, “Do this.” | A present imperative can be rendered with ongoing force, so “keep doing” is possible. The phrase becomes problematic only when combined with “means” and a doctrine reducing the Eucharist to an annual memorial. The verb itself does not specify annual frequency or deny sacramental reality. | Minor and defensible alone; doctrinally significant as part of the larger pattern. | — | Grade Caspectual expansion |
| 33 | “Memorial tombs” | John 5:28 and numerous Gospel burial narratives | “…all those in the memorial tombs will hear his voice…” | Greek μνημεῖον means tomb, grave, or memorial monument. | “Memorial tomb” preserves an etymological association with remembrance but is not ordinary English and can reinforce the idea that resurrection depends on God’s memory of an extinguished person. “Tombs” is sufficient in context. | An over-literal and doctrinally suggestive expression, not a major grammatical error. | — | Grade Cunusual interpretive expansion |
| 34 | Contextual handling of “soul” | Matthew 10:28; Luke 12:4–5; Acts 2:27; James 5:20; 1 Peter 3:20; Revelation 6:9–11; 20:4 | The NWT translates נֶפֶשׁ / ψυχή variously as life, person, creature, or soul. | Both Hebrew נֶפֶשׁ and Greek ψυχή have a broad range: life, self, person, living being, and soul. | Contextual variation is good translation practice and is not automatically evidence of bias. Concern arises only where a rendering is selected to suppress a body–soul distinction or where doctrinal notes insist that “soul” can never denote an immaterial personal aspect. Matthew 10:28 itself preserves a clear distinction between body and soul. | A doctrinal-glossary issue more than a uniform translation error. | — | Grade C/Dsemantic-range issue |
| 35 | Depersonalizing the Holy Spirit through terminology and pronouns | John 14:16–17, 26; 15:26; 16:7–15; Acts 8:29; 10:19–20; 13:2; Romans 8:26–27; 1 Corinthians 12:11 | The NWT consistently prints “holy spirit” and often uses impersonal language compatible with “active force.” | Greek capitalization is editorial, and grammatical gender does not by itself establish personality. Yet the Spirit speaks, sends, chooses, intercedes, wills, teaches, and can be grieved. | Lowercase letters alone are not mistranslation. The cumulative use of “active force,” “it,” and impersonal explanatory notes, however, directs readers away from the personal actions expressed in the text. | The strongest error is Genesis 1:2; many New Testament examples are better classified as a systematic interpretive policy. | — | Grade Ccumulative policy, not capitalization proof |
| 36 | “Hades/Sheol” and “the Grave” | Selected occurrences throughout Psalms, the Gospels, Acts, and Revelation | The NWT often renders שְׁאוֹל and ᾅδης as “the Grave,” capitalized. | The terms can denote the grave, the realm of the dead, or death’s domain depending on context. | Rendering every occurrence as a single capitalized abstraction tends to impose one doctrine of the state of the dead. Nevertheless, “grave” is lexically possible in many passages and may be preferable to the misleading English “hell.” | A flattening of semantic range, not a clear error in every occurrence. | — | Grade C/Dinterpretive capitalization |
| 37 | 1 Corinthians 15:29 interpreted rather than translated | 1 Corinthians 15:29 | The NWT uses an expanded formulation concerning people being “baptized for the purpose of being dead ones.” | Greek: οἱ βαπτιζόμενοι ὑπὲρ τῶν νεκρῶν, literally, “those being baptized for/on behalf of the dead.” | The passage is notoriously difficult. Any smooth English rendering contains interpretation, but the NWT’s expansion excludes other readings without signaling the uncertainty. | A difficult-text paraphrase that should be accompanied by a transparent literal note. | — | Grade Cdifficult text resolved in the main line |
| 38 | “Torture stake” and “executed on a stake” | All occurrences of σταυρός and σταυρόω; principal references in Appendix B | The NWT systematically replaces “cross/crucify” with “torture stake” and “execute on a stake.” | σταυρός could denote a stake, pole, or Roman execution instrument; by the Roman period it could include structures with a crossbeam. σταυρόω means crucify/affix to such an instrument. | The Greek does not specify the exact geometry each time. “Torture stake” is more archaeologically specific than the word warrants, while “impale” can describe a different execution procedure. “Cross” is the conventional English historical term and does not require a full architectural claim. | A systematic, over-confident historical rendering rather than an indisputable lexical falsehood. | — | Grade B/Cover-specific historical claim |
| 39 | “Presence” used uniformly for παρουσία | Matthew 24:3, 27, 37, 39; 1 Corinthians 15:23; 1 Thessalonians 2:19; 3:13; 4:15; 5:23; 2 Thessalonians 2:1, 8–9; James 5:7–8; 2 Peter 1:16; 3:4, 12; 1 John 2:28 | The NWT normally renders παρουσία as “presence.” | παρουσία can mean presence, arrival, advent, or the visit and ensuing presence of a ruler. | “Presence” is lexically valid, especially in non-eschatological contexts. Uniform use can conceal the arrival/advent component and facilitates the Watchtower doctrine of an invisible presence beginning in 1914 even where the context describes conspicuous public events. | Not an error in every occurrence; a one-word policy that narrows a flexible term. | — | Grade Clegitimate meaning narrowed into a doctrinal technical term |
| 40 | “Conclusion of the system of things” | Matthew 13:39–40, 49; 24:3; 28:20; Hebrews 9:26 and related αἰών vocabulary | “the conclusion of the system of things” | Greek: συντέλεια τοῦ αἰῶνος, “the consummation/end of the age.” | “System of things” turns αἰών (“age”) into a broad sociological system and became a distinctive Watchtower technical expression. It is intelligible, but it is less direct than “end of the age” and can import the organization’s prophetic periodization. | An over-interpreted, sectarian vocabulary choice. | — | Grade Csectarian paraphrase |
| 41 | “Undeserved kindness” for χάρις | John 1:14, 16–17; Romans 3:24; 5:2, 15, 17, 20–21; 1 Corinthians 15:10; 2 Corinthians 12:9; Ephesians 2:5, 8; Titus 2:11; Hebrews 4:16 and many others | The NWT usually renders χάρις as “undeserved kindness.” | χάρις can mean grace, favor, graciousness, gift, generosity, gratitude, or beneficent power. | Free and unmerited favor is central in many contexts, but “undeserved” is not present in every occurrence and “kindness” does not cover the term’s full theological and relational range. The phrase can also sound merely attitudinal where Paul speaks of grace as an active divine gift or power. | A recurring explanatory paraphrase, not a false translation in every verse. | — | Grade Csemantic range narrowed |
| 42 | “Congregation” for ἐκκλησία | Matthew 16:18; Acts; Pauline letters; Revelation | The NWT consistently uses “congregation.” | ἐκκλησία means assembly, congregation, or church depending on context and English convention. | “Congregation” is linguistically legitimate. Its consistent use distances the text from historic Christian ecclesial language and echoes Watchtower organization terminology, but that sociological effect does not make the word inaccurate. | A valid translation choice; criticize the policy’s effect, not the lexicon itself. | — | Grade Dvalid equivalent with sectarian resonance |
| 43 | “Declared righteous” for δικαιόω | Romans, Galatians, James | The NWT often uses “declare righteous.” | δικαιόω can mean justify, declare righteous, vindicate, acquit, or show to be righteous. | Forensic language is genuinely part of the word’s range. The problem arises only when one English gloss is treated as proving that justification is purely external and never transformative or demonstrative. James 2, for example, uses the same verb in a context of vindication by works. | Usually defensible translation; doctrinal overreach occurs in interpretation rather than the words alone. | — | Grade C/Doften defensible, sometimes theologically narrowing |
| 44 | Expanding ἐν Χριστῷ to “in union with Christ” | Numerous Pauline occurrences, including Romans 8:1; 1 Corinthians 1:2; 2 Corinthians 5:17; Ephesians 1:3–13 | The NWT frequently renders “in Christ” as “in union with Christ.” | Greek: ἐν Χριστῷ, literally, “in Christ.” | Union is an important Pauline concept and may explain the phrase well. Yet “in union with” fixes one interpretation and can obscure the compact, multivalent spatial and participatory metaphor Paul repeatedly uses. | A useful commentary gloss that should not replace the literal phrase every time. | — | Grade Cexplanatory expansion |
| 45 | “Chief Agent” for ἀρχηγός | Acts 3:15; 5:31; Hebrews 2:10; 12:2 | “Chief Agent of life”; “Chief Agent and Savior”; “Chief Agent of their salvation”; “Chief Agent and Perfecter of our faith.” | ἀρχηγός can mean originator, founder, pioneer, leader, prince, author, or champion. | “Chief Agent” is possible as an explanatory gloss, but in modern English it can make Christ sound like a delegated intermediary rather than the originator or pioneer expressed by the term. “Founder,” “author,” or “pioneer” usually communicates more naturally. | An awkward, doctrinally congenial choice rather than a direct grammatical error. | — | Grade Cawkward and potentially diminishing |
| 46 | “Public declaration” for confession language | Romans 10:9–10; 1 Timothy 6:12–13; Hebrews 3:1; 4:14; 10:23 | The NWT frequently speaks of making a “public declaration.” | ὁμολογέω / ὁμολογία mean confess, acknowledge, profess, or confession/profession. | Public expression may be implied in some settings, but “public declaration” can make witness activity sound built into the lexical meaning even where the text simply says confess or hold fast a confession. | A recurrent explanatory rendering, not a universal lexical equivalent. | — | Grade Corganizationally colored expansion |
| 47 | “Faithful and discreet slave” | Matthew 24:45 | “Who really is the faithful and discreet slave…?” | Greek φρόνιμος means prudent, sensible, wise, or shrewd. | “Discreet” was an older English sense of prudent and is not impossible. In Watchtower usage, however, the phrase has become an organizational title, which can make the translation sound as though the office is directly named in Greek. | A defensible but dated gloss whose sectarian technical use exceeds the lexical wording. | — | Grade C/Dpossible adjective, sectarian technical phrase |
| 48 | “Superior authorities” | Romans 13:1 | “Let every person be in subjection to the superior authorities…” | Greek: ἐξουσίαις ὑπερεχούσαις, “governing/higher authorities.” | “Superior” reflects ὑπερέχω (“be above/surpass”), so it is not wrong. “Governing authorities” is clearer modern English. The phrase should not be confused with Watchtower internal authority structures; Paul’s context concerns civil rulers. | A legitimate, if less idiomatic, rendering. | — | Grade C/Dliteral possibility with institutional resonance |
| 49 | “Inspiration” and “spirit-inspired” vocabulary | Various occurrences | The NWT often replaces traditional theological terms with explanatory phrases. | Source-language words have contextual ranges that may or may not map neatly onto inherited English theological vocabulary. | Some explanatory translations improve clarity; others turn a disputed interpretation into the text. A mere difference from traditional terminology is not proof of corruption. | No blanket error can be assigned without examining each source construction. | — | Grade C/Devaluate case by case |
| 50 | “Young woman” in Isaiah 7:14 | Isaiah 7:14; compare Matthew 1:23 | “Look! The young woman will become pregnant…” | Hebrew עַלְמָה means a young woman of marriageable age and may imply virginity; the Septuagint uses παρθένος, “virgin.” | “Young woman” is defensible for the Masoretic Hebrew. An Orthodox translation may reasonably follow the Septuagint and read “virgin,” especially because Matthew quotes that Greek wording. The NWT itself renders Matthew 1:23 “virgin.” | Not a clear translation error; it reflects a source-text and semantic choice. | — | Grade D/Cdefensible Hebrew rendering, different Septuagint tradition |
| 51 | Psalm 22:16 and “they pierced” | Psalm 22:16 | English editions vary between a lion-like reading and “they pierced my hands and my feet.” | The Masoretic consonantal text is difficult; the Septuagint reads ὤρυξαν, “they dug/pierced,” and some Hebrew evidence supports a verbal reading. | An Orthodox critique may prefer the Septuagint, but it is inaccurate to present the Masoretic difficulty as a simple NWT fabrication. The verse requires textual criticism. | A disputed source-text reading, not a uniquely Watchtower error. | — | Grade D/Cgenuine textual-critical problem |
| 52 | “Mighty God” in Isaiah 9:6 | Isaiah 9:6 | “His name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace.” | Hebrew includes אֵל גִּבּוֹר, “Mighty God.” | The NWT does not remove the divine title. Jehovah’s Witness interpretation distinguishes “Mighty God” from “Almighty God,” but that is an exegetical argument, not a translation corruption of the title itself. | Common accusation rejected: the main text preserves the phrase. | — | Grade Dcorrectly retained |
| 53 | Using “Jehovah” for יהוה in the Hebrew Bible | Nearly 7,000 Hebrew Bible occurrences | The NWT normally represents the Tetragrammaton as “Jehovah.” | Hebrew manuscripts contain יהוה. English traditions variously use LORD, Yahweh, Jehovah, or another representation. | “Jehovah” is a historically hybrid English form and “Yahweh” is closer to the probable ancient pronunciation, but representing יהוה by a divine-name form is a legitimate translation policy. The objection in this catalogue concerns places where the Greek New Testament does not contain the Tetragrammaton. | Not a translation error merely because another pronunciation or convention is preferred. | — | Grade Dnot the same problem as New Testament insertion |
| 54 | Older “taking in knowledge” at John 17:3 | John 17:3 | Older editions: “their taking in knowledge of you…”; 2013: “their coming to know you…” | Greek γινώσκωσιν expresses knowing/coming to know. | The older wording could make eternal life sound like accumulating doctrinal information. The 2013 revision substantially improved the verse. | Do not attribute the older wording unchanged to the current edition. | — | Grade Dcorrected older-edition problem |
| 55 | Older brackets around “other” in Colossians 1 | Colossians 1:16–17 | Older editions bracketed “[other]”; the 2013 main text prints “other” without brackets. | Greek still reads “all things.” | The revision made the English smoother but less transparent about the supplied word. | A current-edition problem that became harder for an ordinary reader to detect. | — | Grade Aaddition retained, disclosure reduced |
| 56 | Earlier NWT use of “worship” at Hebrews 1:6 | Hebrews 1:6 | Early NWT wording used “worship” in this verse; later editions standardized “do obeisance.” | Greek προσκυνησάτωσαν is the same worship/homage verb discussed above. | The change illustrates how the translation’s terminology developed in the direction of a sharper distinction between worship of God and homage to Christ. | Historically significant, though current-edition criticism should quote the current text. | — | Grade D/Bhistorical revision note |
| 57 | John 10:30 | John 10:30 | “I and the Father are one.” | Greek: ἐγὼ καὶ ὁ πατὴρ ἕν ἐσμεν. | The NWT accurately preserves the statement. Whether “one” denotes unity of action, power, or divine nature is an interpretive question. | Common accusation rejected: the English wording is substantially sound. | — | Grade Dnot mistranslated |
| 58 | John 2:19–21 | John 2:19–21 | Jesus says, “I will raise it up,” referring to the temple of his body. | Greek preserves Jesus as the subject of the raising statement. | The passage may challenge Watchtower explanations of Christ’s resurrection, but the NWT does not erase the wording. | Doctrinal tension is not translation error. | — | Grade Dnot mistranslated |
| 59 | “Firstborn of all creation” | Colossians 1:15 | “the firstborn of all creation” | Greek: πρωτότοκος πάσης κτίσεως. | “Firstborn” can denote birth order, supremacy, inheritance rank, or preeminence. The phrase itself is translated normally. The decisive NWT alteration occurs in verses 16–17, where “other” is added to force Christ inside the created set. | Do not call verse 15 alone a mistranslation. | — | Grade Dphrase itself is accurate; the added “other” is the problem |
| 60 | Thomas’s confession | John 20:28 | “My Lord and my God!” | Greek: ὁ κύριός μου καὶ ὁ θεός μου. | The NWT preserves Thomas’s direct address to Jesus. Jehovah’s Witness interpretation of the confession is a separate issue. | Common accusation rejected: the main wording is accurate. | — | Grade Dcorrectly retained |
| 61 | Critical-text omission of later passages | Mark 16:9–20; John 7:53–8:11; Acts 8:37 and similar variants | The NWT places some traditional passages outside the main text or marks them as later additions. | The earliest and strongest Greek witnesses omit or vary these passages, and modern critical editions likewise mark them. | One may discuss canonical reception and liturgical use, but omission from a critical-text main line is not evidence that the Watchtower removed verses merely because they contradicted its theology. | Text-critical judgment, not a uniquely NWT error. | — | Grade Dnot uniquely doctrinal corruption |
| 62 | The Comma Johanneum | 1 John 5:7–8 in the later Textus Receptus form | The NWT does not print the late Trinitarian expansion about the Father, Word, and Holy Spirit being one. | The expanded clause is absent from the early Greek manuscript tradition and entered the printed Greek text very late. | Its omission should not be used as proof that the NWT deliberately erased an original Trinitarian verse. The Trinity must be argued from the broader canonical text, not the Comma’s late wording. | Common accusation rejected on textual-critical grounds. | — | Grade Dcorrectly excluded from a critical Greek text |
| 63 | Capitalization of “God,” “god,” and “Holy Spirit” | Throughout the translation | Greek and Hebrew manuscripts do not encode modern English capitalization in the same way. | Capital letters in an English Bible are editorial interpretation rather than direct lexical data. | Lowercasing “god” at John 1:1/1:18 and “holy spirit” is doctrinally suggestive and should be criticized as editorial framing. It is still methodologically important not to claim that the translators changed a capital letter present in the Greek manuscripts. | An interpretive typography policy, not a source-text letter-for-letter corruption. | — | Grade D/CEnglish editorial choice, sometimes doctrinally suggestive |